
DE&I (Diversity, Equity & Inclusion) initiatives have become increasingly common in organizations across America, yet many companies are now pulling back from these programs.
As someone who is both a business owner and who has studied executive and high level leadership for years-
I want to explore the nuances of why DE&I efforts often fall short and what we can do to make them more effective.
The Historical Context of DE&I
To understand where we are, we must first recognize where we've been. DE&I initiatives emerged in the aftermath of the Civil Rights Act of the 1960s – only 60 years ago.
This is not ancient history; my parents were toddlers during this time, and my grandparents were adults. The trauma of segregation and inequality remains fresh in our collective memory.
During this period:
As we progressed through the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, affirmative action and other initiatives helped create more opportunities for previously marginalized groups.
The conversation evolved from equality (equal access) to equity (addressing disparities in resources and knowledge that prevented equal outcomes).
Black Americans gained equal rights under the law after centuries of discrimination
The feminist movement followed, expanding rights for women
All of this occurred against the backdrop of significant national trauma (World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War)
Where DE&I Struggled: Two Critical Failures
1. We Didn't Start with the Leaders
The first major mistake in DE&I implementation is that we rarely begin by ensuring organizational leaders feel included, valued, and regulated themselves. Instead, DE&I is often:
Imposed on leadership from external pressure
Implemented without addressing leaders' own experiences of harm and trauma
Expected to succeed without creating psychological safety for those in power
Many executives and high-level professionals don't feel they can be vulnerable or authentic. They've often achieved their positions by cutting off parts of themselves and are now expected to implement inclusion initiatives while themselves feeling excluded.
I witnessed this firsthand in healthcare when I was completing my doctorate in nursing. In a meeting about nurse safety, high-level decision-makers were creating policies without any nurse managers present.
As someone who had experienced workplace harm as a nurse, I felt tremendous risk in speaking up – would pointing out flaws in their plan jeopardize my position?
When leaders operate from dysregulated nervous systems – overwhelmed, defensive, or afraid – they make shortsighted decisions.
They may genuinely want to implement DE&I initiatives but lack the regulation and healing needed to do so effectively.
2. We Didn't Allow for Diversity of PERSPECTIVE
The second critical failure is not creating space for genuine questions and diverse perspectives about DE&I implementation. When someone questions a diversity hiring practice and is immediately labeled racist or sexist without explanation, we shut down necessary dialogue.
For DE&I to work, we must be able to explain:
The historical context behind these initiatives
How certain groups have been systematically excluded
Why diverse perspectives benefit all of us
How hiring decisions will balance skills with representation
When we shame people for asking questions, we kill off a crucial aspect of diversity – diversity of PERSPECTIVE.
True inclusion means everyone has a seat at the table, including those with differing viewpoints.
I've heard from many people, particularly white men, who feel they no longer have a voice in these conversations. When people feel excluded from "inclusion" efforts, they become more susceptible to radicalization – not less.
(Here is an incredibly insightful video on the topic of how humans become radicalized to hate groups, by former Neo-Nazi recruiter Arno Michaelis).
Where DE&I Struggled: Two Critical Failures
The key element missing from most DE&I work is attention to nervous system regulation. When humans feel threatened or dysregulated, we become:
More narrow-minded
More defensive
Less capable of empathy
More likely to perceive threat where it is not actively present
For DE&I initiatives to succeed, we need to start with trauma recovery and nervous system regulation work. This creates the foundation that allows people to:
Recognize harm they've experienced without becoming defensive
Acknowledge harm they may have caused without collapsing into shame
Engage in difficult conversations with curiosity rather than fear
Make decisions from a place of regulation rather than reaction
Moving Forward: A More Regulated Approach
The path forward requires us to:
Begin with leadership regulation: Help leaders process their own experiences and trauma before implementing DE&I initiatives
Create psychological safety: Ensure everyone feels they can ask questions without being shamed
Honor all perspectives: True inclusion means everyone has a voice in the process
Address the nervous system: Understand that dysregulation leads to poor implementation and backlash
Until people can approach DE&I with kindness, compassion, and curiosity – from a regulated nervous system state – we'll continue to see resistance and failure.
By addressing the root causes of this resistance, we can create more effective and sustainable progress toward truly diverse, equitable, and inclusive organizations.
--Dr. Lee
If you desire, our ITRR team is here to support you in exploring how nervous system regulation can benefit you (and your organization). You can connect with us HERE
READ MORE POSTS BY THIS AUTHOR
Mark Smith
Mark Smith
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Copyright: Your biz details here.